Self-publishing or traditional publishing: Which is better?

Both self-publishing and traditional publishing have their own advantages and disadvantages, so the decision of which one is better largely depends on your goals and priorities as an author.

Traditional publishing typically involves submitting your manuscript to a publishing house, which will then take care of the editing, design, printing, and distribution of your book. In exchange, the publisher will pay you an advance and royalties on each sale. The main advantage of traditional publishing is that you get the support and expertise of a team of professionals who can help you refine your work and reach a wider audience. However, the process can be long and competitive, and you may have to compromise on creative control and royalties.

Self-publishing, on the other hand, allows you to have full creative control over your book and keep a larger share of the profits. You can choose your own editors, designers, and distributors, and set your own prices and marketing strategies. Self-publishing is also faster and more flexible than traditional publishing, as you can release your book whenever you want and make changes to it at any time. However, you will have to invest more time and money upfront, and you may face more challenges in terms of marketing and distribution.

Ultimately, the choice between self-publishing and traditional publishing depends on your goals, preferences, and resources as an author. If you prioritize creative control and speed, and are willing to invest in your own marketing and distribution efforts, self-publishing may be the way to go. If you value the support and prestige of a traditional publisher, and are willing to work through the submission and revision process, traditional publishing may be a better fit for you.

Leave a comment:
📨 Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest tips via email.

{{ subscribeForm.errors.get('email') }}
{{ subscribeForm.errors.get('terms') }}